More Stories

mardi 26 mai 2026

This 34-Inch Asus QD-OLED Monitor Is $300 Off Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The Asus ROG Strix XG34WCDG packs a 34-inch QD-OLED panel with a 3440x1440 resolution, 175Hz refresh rate, and a near-instant 0.03ms response time into a monitor that can comfortably handle both high-end gaming and creative workloads. It also comes factory-calibrated, so color accuracy is already dialed in out of the box instead of requiring extra tweaking. Normally priced at $999, it’s currently down to $699—the lowest price it’s ever hit, according to price-tracking tools.

The QD-OLED panel is the main draw here. You get OLED's perfect blacks and near-instant pixel response combined with quantum dot color performance, while the 1800R curve adds genuine wraparound immersion without making straight lines look warped. Plus, the matte coating on this panel keeps it usable when there's ambient light in the room—a real consideration on glossy OLED panels. Asus also takes burn-in seriously, pairing a custom heatsink and graphene film cooling with a full OLED Care Pro software suite that shifts pixels, dims the screen when you walk away, and watches for static UI elements like taskbars and HUDs. It's a lot of infrastructure for a problem that shouldn't come up often, but it's reassuring to have.

On the gaming side, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and G-Sync compatibility keep gameplay smooth across both AMD and NVIDIA setups, especially at the monitor’s native 175Hz refresh rate. That said, ultrawide support remains inconsistent in some games, with certain titles adding black bars or awkward UI scaling. OLED brightness is also best in controlled lighting rather than a room flooded with direct sunlight. And while the USB-C port is convenient for charging accessories or connecting lightweight devices, the 15W power delivery falls well short of what you'd want for a proper single-cable laptop setup. Still, for anyone who wants one display that can handle fast-paced gaming, immersive ultrawide experiences, and creative work without obvious compromises, $699 for this panel is a legitimate no-brainer.


Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team


These Nothing ANC Headphones Are at Their Lowest Price Ever Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Nothing over-ear headphones have been quietly taking over the audio game since launching in 2025, with a unique industrial aesthetic, impressive battery life, and ANC that rivals top brands like JBL and Sony. Launched in 2026, the Nothing Headphone(a) are a more affordable alternative to the flagship Nothing Headphone(1)—and still retain many of the same premium features and overall vibe. Right now, a pair is 15% off, bringing the price down to a record-low $169 (originally $199).

These wireless ANC headphones, which earned a PCMag Editors' Choice Award, feature class-leading battery life, excellent sound, and effective noise cancellation. They last up to 135 hours with ANC and AAC codec off, and 75 hours with ANC on. A quick five-minute charge gives you up to eight minutes of playback, and the headphones completely recharge in two hours. The app lets you switch listening modes, adjust how much high- and low-frequency noise gets filtered out, and enable Transparency mode. 

PCMag describes the sound as “rich, bright, and bass-heavy.”  The bass-boosted sound is courtesy of the More Bass EQ preset, and unlike some headphone brands, the bass is pronounced but doesn’t overpower the mids and highs, remaining fairly balanced. They have 40mm dynamic drivers and a 20-40kHz frequency response, earning them Hi-Res Audio certification.

The headphones use four HD mics to capture voices clearly, and do a good job of blocking out ambient noise. While this is a small step down from the six mics on the Headphone(1), they’re not a stripped-down budget version. They share many of the same features, including ANC, spatial audio with head tracking, LDAC high-res codec support, and USB-C lossless audio. The main tradeoffs are in material, appearance, and subtle differences in sound tuning. While still plush and comfy, the earcups aren’t quite as supple as those on the flagship pair.

That said, you might actually prefer the Nothing(a) if you want a more low-key look. They also have better battery life, and the lighter materials make them more comfortable and compact. If you’re looking for a long-lasting, feature-rich pair of over-ear ANC headphones that back up the aesthetics with genuinely strong sound, the Nothing Headphone(a) is a solid option.

Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team


jeudi 21 mai 2026

This Sonos Beam Soundbar Is Over $200 Off Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The first-generation Sonos Beam has dropped to $260.93 at Woot for an open-box unit, and according to price trackers, that’s the lowest price this soundbar has hit so far. For comparison, the same model is still sitting around $488 on Amazon, where it has never dropped below $299. The “open box” label here is also less risky than it sounds. Woot says the packaging may have been opened for testing or display purposes, but the soundbar itself is new and still covered by a standard 12-month manufacturer’s warranty. Shipping is free for Prime members, while everyone else pays an extra $6. This deal runs for the next four days or until stock runs out.

Even though this is the older Beam from 2018, it still holds up surprisingly well if your main goal is improving TV audio without stuffing a giant soundbar under your screen. It is compact enough to fit comfortably in front of most TVs without blocking the display, and it looks clean in a way many bulkier soundbars don’t. More importantly, it works with Alexa, AirPlay 2, Siri, and Google Assistant, and it slides easily into a multi-room Sonos setup if you already own other speakers from the company.

Sonos packed four full-range drivers, a tweeter, and three passive radiators inside its small frame, and the result is a fuller, more detailed sound than most built-in TV speakers can manage. Dialogue comes through clearly, and movies have noticeably better depth and bass without immediately forcing you to buy a separate subwoofer. That said, it doesn’t support newer formats like Dolby Atmos, so you’re not getting the same overhead surround effects you’d find on newer premium models—but for apartments, bedrooms, or smaller living rooms, the Sonos Beam feels appropriately sized.

Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team


This 65-Inch Toshiba Fire TV Is 50% Off Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The 65-inch Toshiba C350 Fire TV is down to $264.99 on Amazon right now, which is half off its usual $529.99 price and the lowest it has dropped so far, according to price trackers. At this price, it sits in the same territory as many smaller budget sets, but with a much bigger screen. The main appeal here is simple: You’re getting a straightforward 65-inch 4K TV with Amazon’s Fire TV platform already built in—and because of that, setup is pretty painless if you already use Amazon devices. Once you sign in with your Amazon account, Prime Video recommendations, watchlists, and Alexa features are already sitting there waiting for you.

The interface looks and behaves exactly like Amazon’s streaming hardware, right down to the content-heavy home screen and Alexa voice controls. Picture quality is decent for the money, though this is still very much an entry-level TV—the C350 handles 4K and HDR content, but it skips higher-end features like local dimming, wide color support, HDMI 2.1 gaming features, or a high refresh rate. In practice, while movies and shows look perfectly fine for casual viewing, contrast and color fall a bit behind those of similarly priced models from TCL and Vizio, especially in darker scenes, notes this CNET review. Fast-moving sports and games also won’t look as smooth as they would on more expensive TVs. Still, for everyday streaming, YouTube, and regular cable viewing, it gets the job done without major issues.

The bigger compromise is really the Fire TV experience itself. Amazon pushes its own content hard, and the interface can feel more cluttered and slower than other smart platform layouts. Some apps also work differently than they do on competing smart TV systems. For example, you can’t directly buy movies inside the Vudu app on this TV. Small annoyances like that add up depending on how you watch things. Also, the USB ports here don’t provide enough power for many external streaming sticks, so if you eventually switch away from Fire TV, you may need separate power cables for those devices.


Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team


This Is How Many Calories You 'Should' Burn Each Day

by

The word “calorie” may bring up thoughts of nutrition labels and treadmill readouts, but really calories are just units of energy. Your car runs on gas, your house runs on electricity, and your body runs on food energy. So how many calories do we burn each day, and how many should you burn? Let’s dig in.

You actually burn most of your calories at rest

Calories aren’t only burned during exercise. It takes energy to keep the lights on, so to speak—for your heart to beat, your brain to think, your cells to repair themselves, and more. 

In fact, most of our calories are burned doing these maintenance chores. Scientists call this baseline calorie burn our "basal metabolic rate," or BMR. There are several equations that will estimate your BMR; for a calculator, try the one at tdeecalculator.net. (It uses the Mifflin-St. Jeor formula if you don’t know your body fat percentage, and the Katch-McArdle formula if you do.)

To give you an example, I plugged in my stats—I’m 150 pounds and 5’6”—and the equation guesses that someone my size burns: 

  • 1,352 calories for most of my basic bodily functions (not including digestion!)

  • 1,623 calories, total, if I’m sedentary

  • 2,096 calories, total, if I do moderate exercise three to five times a week

  • 2,569 calories, total, if I’m a hardcore athlete or a person who exercises on top of having a physical job

Keep in mind these are just estimates; your actual calorie burn may be more or less. (From tracking my calories over the years, I know that I'm usually somewhere between those last two numbers, depending on how active I am.) The factors that affect your total calorie burn include: 

  • Body size: The bigger you are, the more calories you burn at baseline and the more you burn during exercise.

  • Muscle mass: Muscle burns more calories than other tissues, which is why you get a more accurate estimate if you know your body fat percentage; the lower your body fat, the more muscle you have by comparison.

  • Age: These formulas assume that your metabolism slows down a bit as you age (although there is evidence that this may not make a big difference).

  • Activity: The more you exercise, the more calories you burn.

  • Genetics and other factors not accounted for in the formula: There’s actually a huge variety from person to person, even if you compare people of the same size, age, etc. We're all different.

To give you a sense of the range, the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans calculates calorie counts for two example people, who are both a bit smaller than average Americans, but let's take a look anyway. The document figures that a 5’10” man who weighs 154 pounds will burn, in total, between 2,000 and 3,000 calories each day, depending on his age and activity level. Their example woman is 5’4” and 126 pounds, and she will burn between 1,600 and 2,400 calories

So if you’re used to thinking of 2,000 calories as some kind of upper limit for how much to eat—or 1,200 calories as a calorie budget for dieting—you may be surprised to realize how many calories you probably already burn.

How (and why) to burn more calories

If you’re trying to lose weight, logic would say that you should focus more on diet than exercise. After all, if most of your calorie burn is your BMR, exercise is going to be a drop in the bucket by comparison. 

I don’t think that’s the only thing you should consider, though. If your BMR is 1,300 calories and your total burn is 1,600, then sure, you could eat 1,300 calories without exercising and probably lose weight. But it’s hard to be healthy while you’re eating so little. 

Burning more calories through exercise helps your body in two ways: 

  1. Exercise is good for us, regardless of calorie burn; we should all be getting at least 150 minutes of cardio per week, plus some strength training to help build or retain muscle.

  2. The more food you eat, the easier it is to fit in the good stuff: vitamins, minerals, fiber, good fats, and a variety of vegetables.

A person who burns 2,300 calories and eats 2,000 is in a much better position to benefit from exercise and good nutrition than a person who burns 1,600 and eats 1,300. 

So how do you burn more calories? You can’t get younger, and if you’re losing weight you won’t want to get bigger. The biggest levers you can pull are: 

  • Exercise more

  • Gain muscle mass (through strength training, and eating plenty of protein)

  • Don’t diet all the time

I’ve written before about how I’ve noticed my total calorie burn increases when I’m eating more food; when you feed your body, it’s more willing to expend energy. This is one of the reasons it’s thought to be beneficial to take “diet breaks” if you plan to be in a weight-loss phase for a long time.

Why you shouldn’t rely on “calorie burn” numbers from wearables or exercise machines

You’re probably wondering how much exercise is “enough” to burn more calories. It’s a trick question, though: You want to change what kind of person you are—stop being sedentary and become a frequent exerciser—rather than nickel-and-dime yourself about exactly what numbers you burned in which workout.

This is because our bodies get more efficient with exercise over time. A half-hour jog might burn 300 calories in theory, but at the end of the day you may have only burned, say, 200 more than if you hadn’t jogged. You might end up feeling more tired later in the day, or you might just be getting better at running and burning fewer calories when you do it. (This is an ongoing area of scientific research.) 

There is evidence that exercise machines’ estimates of calorie burn are extremely inaccurate; wearables like Fitbits and Apple Watches are probably a bit better, being personalized to your exercise intensity, but they’re still ultimately relying on estimates that aren’t always accurate.



mercredi 20 mai 2026

Android Is Finally Getting Its Own Version of Apple's 'Handoff'

by

Love it or hate it, the Apple ecosystem has its perks. Take "Handoff," for example: If you have at least two connected devices, such as an iPhone and a Mac, you can start a task on one and carry it over to the other. You can start reading an article in Safari on your iPhone, then pick it up when you get to your Mac. Or, say you're on a FaceTime call on your Mac, but you have to run; you can simply switch to your iPhone to keep the conversation going, without having to call them back. It isn't perfect, but it works, it works.

Android doesn't quite have the same setup. While some functions work across devices, like transferring calls, users with an Android phone often don't have the ability to open the same task on their tablet, and vice versa. If you're reviewing a spreadsheet in Google Sheets on your phone, you can't just pick it up on your tablet for a larger view; you instead need to open Sheets on your tablet, then find your way to the document in question. The same goes for many other Google apps, like Chrome, Gmail, Drive, and Docs: Android could really benefit from a dedicated cross-platform option. Luckily, it's on the way, in the form of a new feature called "Continue On."

How "Continue On" works on Android

Google announced "Continue On" during its "What's new in Android" discussion on Tuesday. As reported by 9to5Google, this is a new feature as of Android 17, and will be available in Android 17 RC1. If you've ever used Handoff in the Apple ecosystem, you'll understand the core idea behind Continue On: When you open an app on one of your Android devices, you'll notice the app appear on your other device, with a "Handoff Suggestion label" hovering above it.

handoff suggestion icon
Credit: Google

Say you're working on a Google Doc on your Pixel phone. When you open your Pixel tablet, you'll notice the Google Docs icon populate in the doc, with a special label—even if you already have Google Docs in your dock. If you tap the standard Google Docs icon, you'll open the app as per usual; if you tap the Handoff Suggestion, you'll open the Google Doc you're working on on your phone. In another example, you might be reading through a Gmail thread on your phone, but prefer to finish catching up on your tablet. In this case, the Handoff Suggestion would be Chrome: Tap it on your tablet, and you'll pull up the thread in Gmail on the bigger screen.

Google appears to be taking its time with implementing Continue On. While the feature will work "bidirectionally" in the future, at launch, it only works from phone to tablet. That means you won't be able to hand off a Google Doc from your tablet to your phone, only from your phone to your tablet. Additionally, Google says it's up to developers to decide how they want this experience to run with their own apps. They can open the same app across both devices (Google Docs to Google Docs), or open the web app from the mobile app (Gmail mobile app to Gmail web app in Chrome). Developers can also opt for a mix of both: While the default can be app-to-app, developers can choose to fall back to the web app if the user doesn't have the app installed on their tablet.



This Insta360 Flagship Action Camera Is 21% Off Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The Insta360 Ace Pro 2 (Dual Battery Bundle) has dropped to $329.99 on Amazon from its usual $419 price, and according to price trackers, it’s just 99 cents above its all-time low. That makes it one of the more compelling alternatives to the GoPro Hero 13 Black right now, especially for people who want usable 4K footage rather than headline-grabbing 8K specs. The good news is that the camera is genuinely very good at that—it can record 4K at up to 120fps for smooth slow-motion clips, and the footage looks sharp without going overboard on artificial sharpening. The stabilization is also excellent for biking, travel, skiing, or handheld walking shots, where shaky footage usually ruins the experience.

The camera itself remains compact and rugged, with waterproofing and support for the huge ecosystem of mounts and accessories already available for action cameras. Its 1/1.3-inch sensor handles low light better than many rivals, so indoor footage, evening city shots, and cloudy outdoor clips have more detail and less noise than you might expect from a camera this small. Insta360 also includes an I-log profile, which gives experienced editors more flexibility with color grading and dynamic range during post-production. At the same time, beginners can simply use the standard modes and let the camera handle everything automatically. And, unlike the dual-display setup on DJI and GoPro cameras, the Ace Pro 2’s larger front-facing flip-up 2.5-inch touchscreen makes framing yourself much easier when filming solo or recording vlog-style clips.

The bundle includes two batteries, which is helpful because action cameras burn through power quickly when recording high-resolution video. You also get a standard mount, USB-C cable, wind guard, and microphone cap. That said, the Ace Pro 2 has no built-in storage and relies on external storage for most of your recordings, so you will need to buy a microSD card separately (the bundle does not include one). It supports cards up to 1TB, which is useful if you shoot a lot of footage, but it is still an extra cost to factor in.


Our Best Editor-Vetted Memorial Day Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team


Top Ad 728x90