More Stories

vendredi 21 août 2026

This Pool-Friendly Soundcore Speaker Is 35% Off Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The Soundcore Rave Neo 2 is down to $84.99 at Woot, while the same speaker is currently around $119 on Amazon. Prime members get free standard shipping, while everyone else pays $6, and the sale is expected to run for the next ten days unless it sells out sooner.

Its built-in handle makes it easy to move from the patio to the garage or pool, while the IPX7 rating means you do not have to panic over splashes or even a brief dunk in the water—it can float too, which makes it a much easier speaker to bring around the pool. Battery life should also be enough for most days out, with Soundcore estimating up to 18 hours of playback, though I would expect the real number to depend on your volume and whether you keep the RGB lights running. Still, it should comfortably get through an afternoon and evening without needing a recharge.

It also has enough volume for a small outdoor gathering, and the extra bass gives dance tracks and pop more weight than you would get from a smaller portable speaker—with the companion app giving you access to EQ controls if you want to adjust the tuning. That said, the bass reportedly starts to compress as you push the speaker toward maximum volume, so cranking it all the way up can make the sound less controlled. Its front-facing design also means the audio is strongest when you are sitting in front of it rather than spreading evenly around a group, and while its IPX7 rating covers water, it has no protection against dust, so it is not the most reassuring choice for sandy beach trips. The app also requires an account to access its full set of features, notes this PCMag review.




The Newest Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus Is $160 Off Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Finding a decent soundbar under $100 is rare, especially from a brand like Amazon. But right now, the Amazon Fire TV Soundbar Plus in Open Box condition is $89.99 at Woot, compared to its usual $249.99 price on Amazon. The previous low that price trackers tracked was $149, so this deal drops it by another $60. Prime members get free standard shipping, while non-Prime buyers pay a $6 shipping fee. Woot does not ship this product to Alaska, Hawaii, APO addresses, or P.O. Boxes.

This is a 3.1-channel system with three forward-facing drivers and tweeter pairs and two built-in woofers. It’s 37 inches long, which gives it a more substantial presence under a TV. For connectivity, it includes HDMI eARC, optical audio input, USB-A, and a standard power port. You also get Bluetooth for streaming music from your phone, but no wifi, multi-room support, or built-in voice assistant. Despite the name, it does not run the Fire TV smart TV platform. It’s simply a soundbar, and it works with any TV that supports HDMI ARC or optical output, notes this PCMag review. The included remote lets you switch between a few preset EQ modes, adjust bass and treble, and control volume.

In everyday use, it’s a clear upgrade over standard TV speakers. Dialogue sounds crisp and easy to follow, and music has decent detail in the mids and highs, and it can get loud without distortion. The main limitation is bass. On its own, it doesn’t deliver deep low-end impact, so action scenes and bass-heavy tracks won’t feel especially full. Amazon does offer bundles with a wireless subwoofer for $249.99 or a 5.1 setup with surrounds for $399.99, if you want to add more weight and immersion. Also, while the bar supports Dolby Atmos, without height channels, the effect is limited.




jeudi 20 août 2026

10 Shows Like 'Lost' You Should Watch Next

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Lost featured complex, intertwined narratives; more characters than one can reasonably expected to keep up with; and boxes full of secrets. The show, which kicked off with flashbacks that peeled back the layers of the various crash survivors before diving headfirst into surrealism, was an uncommonly smart network offering that rewarded careful viewing. Whether it all wound up being deeply profound or a load of nonsense was always in the eye of the beholder—but it remains one of the most discussed and debated shows in modern TV history.

Fringe (2008 – 2013)

We don't talk nearly enough about Fringe, a smart sci-fi/crime procedural that served as a true successor to the X-Files (and that wrapped more satisfyingly than that show ever did, even given multiple tries), as well as to the weirder aspects of Lost, all while anticipating multiversal storytelling before it got annoying. Starting out as a kind of weird-mystery-of-the-week thing, it soon becomes clear that the odd occurrences the characters have been investigating are all linked to potentially universe-ending incursions across time and space. Stream Fringe on Hulu.


The Leftovers (2014 – 2017)

The premise of The Leftovers is brilliantly subdued: Around two percent of the world's population disappears without explanation, and it's enough to upend just about everything. Politics have adapted to the new normal, religions have collapsed and reformed, and families have had to make peace with the inexplicable loss of loved ones. The first season revolves around the Garvey family, led by Kevin (Justin Theroux), a sheriff whose wife (Amy Brenneman) left him to join a cult, while subsequent seasons broaden the scope to bring in other characters in other locations. Showrunner Damon Lindelof also co-created Lost, and the two series share some similarities (including a relatively grim tone), but where Lost (arguably) spun out of control, The Leftovers recognized that complex plotting and the search for answers is the point. Stream The Leftovers on HBO Max.


Yellowjackets (2021 – )

This time-hopping survival drama is about a group of teenage girls who are stranded in the wilderness in 1996 and do terrible things to survive—the extent of which we only learn about via flashbacks from the present day, where the events of 19 months spent in the wild continue to resonate. There are ambiguous teases of the supernatural here, but there's plenty of human-level horror as well. The show plays in some of the same territory as Lost in its explorations of the morally ambiguous choices we make when in survival mode, while also cynically (but accurately) positing that there's a huge difference between the version of the past we talk about and the one that really happened. Stream Yellowjackets on Paramount+.


Dark (2017 – 2020)

Dark began as a mystery involving a missing child and evolved, over its three seasons, into a wildly complex narrative: a time travel-driven story that explores dark family secrets over the course of several generations. The German import has a striking look and atmospheric feel, with an ensemble cast of teens and adults whose narratives are deftly intertwined. You'd be right to assume that the tone here is darker even than that of Lost, but the shows share loves of complex mysteries, time shifts, and strange holes. Stream Dark on Netflix.


From (2022 – )

Travel to The Town, a place from which no one can ever leave. The residents and visitors are trapped as surely as if they were stranded on an island—and are beset by creatures that come from the woods that kill anyone found outside after dark. The Matthews family learn all about this firsthand when they roll into the place in their RV and soon find themselves trapped alongside the local sheriff (Lost alum Harold Perrineau) just as it's getting dark. The monsters here aren't just mindlessly hungry—they're cunning and sadistic, and more than capable of killing residents in gory ways. It's a supernatural spin on the "small towns ain't what they seem" vibe. Stream From on MGM+.


Alice in Borderland (2020 – )

For the plane-crash survivors of Lost, the island serves as a purgatory, a world that might be alternately paradise and hell for the largely middle-aged castaways. An analog for modern teenagers might look something like Alice in Borderland, where kids find themselves in a world of mysteries—one that feels like an escape until it doesn't. Videogame-obsessed Arisu gets his wish, after a fashion, when he finds himself, along with a couple of friends, transported to an alternate, eerily abandoned version of Tokyo—the title’s Borderland—vividly brought to life via some clever green screen work. The three are directed to an arena and given the instructions for the game, which they’ll be playing whether they want to or not. The first competition involves a locked-room-style puzzle; if they fail, the room goes up in flames with them in it—think Ready Player One, with deadlier stakes. There are games each night, though the rules allow for winners to get time off. There are a lot of rules, actually, but the games are cleverly and sadistically constructed. Stream Alice in Borderland on Netflix.


Battlestar Galactica (2003 – 2009)

While the original Battlestar Galactica was a fun, middling blend of sci-fi and dated kitsch, the aughts reboot from (Star Trek vet and For All Mankind head) Ronald D. Moore and company brought science fiction fully into the prestige TV era. Created to be humanity's robot slaves, the Cylons rebel and launch a sneak attack on the human colonies, leading to an exodus into space. The only hope for humanity is to reach the mythical world of Earth. The monotheistic Cylons see their crusade as a nearly holy one, while the more rationalistic human refugees struggle to survive and find common purpose in an order that's crumbling day by day. Edward James Olmos and Mary McDonnell lead an impressive cast. Stream Battlestar Galactica on Paramount+.


The 100 (2014 – 2020)

The 100 tells the story of the descendants of refugees of nuclear devastation who return to Earth from their habitat in space to encounter the remnants of humanity who have survived on Earth. Naturally, the first people sent to scope things out are the juvenile delinquents (better them than me), and they discover that three civilizations have risen up in the aftermath of the apocalypse, and they are all pretty scary (including one populated by cannibals, naturally). More humane, perhaps, than Lord of the Flies, even as it explores similar themes, this show builds an impressive mythology over the course of its run, leading to a conclusion that’s borderline metaphysical. Buy The 100 from Prime Video.


Missing 9 (2017)

About as close an analog as you're likely to find to Lost is this bonkers South Korean drama. A plane crash leaves a bunch of celebrities (mostly) stranded on a mysterious island—initially, we're getting much of the story via flashbacks from an amnesiac stylist. Things get complicated as the stories of other survivors come to light, and no two people's versions of events quite match. The fame angle adds an extra layer of mystery, as the government investigators are willing to do a little obfuscating to minimize public outcry. We come to learn that five people who never made it off the island had survived the crash, and at least one of the others knows why. Stream Missing 9 on Kocowa via Prime Video.


Silo (2023 – )

The characters in this show all live in the 144-story silo of the title, a sealed environment sustaining (or imprisoning) the last vestiges of humanity on a ravaged Earth. Societal politics blend with civilization-threatening secrets in an impressively conceived dystopia—less mythological than Lost, perhaps, but every bit as mysterious. Based on Hugh Howey’s book trilogy, the show has at least one other thing going for it in addition to its killer cast (including Rebecca Ferguson, Rashida Jones, David Oyelowo, Common, and Tim Robbins): Unlike so many prematurely canceled streaming series, it will reach a planned conclusion after having been renewed for two more seasons. Stream Silo on Apple TV.



I Let Claude Answer My Emails for Me, and Here's How It Went

by

If AI is going to take all of our jobs, the least it can do is make those jobs a little easier while we still have them, and email admin is one of the biggest time sinks I've got in my daily routine. I'm spending hours a week reading and responding to emails when I really need that time to get on with writing about new Pixels or Mac apps.

My interest was piqued then by the news that the Claude AI chatbot can now respond to and send emails in a connected Gmail account–and without your specific approval, if you're happy to let it work automatically.

Claude has been able to plug into Gmail accounts for a while, so you could already get it to read through and summarize incoming messages—but any email drafting had to be done in the Claude bot and copied over. Now the AI is able to compose and send responses inside Gmail without you having to switch over to the Google email client yourself.

Could this free up some more time in my day? Is it really wise to hand over emailing duties to an AI bot? I gave it a try to assess how it might impact my productivity (and sanity).

How to connect Claude to your gmail account

You need a paid Claude plan for this at the moment, so you're going to have to be on the $20-a-month Pro plan or something higher. To connect your Gmail account if you haven't already, open Claude on the web and click your profile picture (bottom left), then select Settings > Connectors and find Gmail. (If you don't see your profile picture, click the menu button, top left.)

To do something in Gmail, you just need to mention it in a prompt. If you're not quite ready to do some drafting and sending, try a prompt like "who's emailed me most today" or "summarize the emails I've received this week." Claude rummages through your Gmail account and delivers what you asked for as a response.

When you're ready to start sending, you can be pretty informal and ambiguous with your prompt. Saying "reply to my last unread email," "reply to David Nield," and "reply to the Story edits thread" will all work in Claude. However, the more precise you can be—with a specific email address, for instance—the better, in terms of avoiding mistakes.

Claude AI
Gmail is one of many Connectors available in Claude. Credit: Lifehacker

If you say "send an email to Dave" and Claude finds three people with that name, it will ask who you mean. However, if it finds the wrong Dave and misses the other two for whatever reason (maybe due to formatting or email address construction), it will make the incorrect pick and not tell you about it. So, be as precise as you can.

Next, you tell Claude what to say: You can dictate the message word for word, or tell Claude to get creative and use its imagination, or do a mix of the two. This works the same as any other text prompt—supply as much or as little direction as you want regarding email content, style, intention, and other characteristics.

You'll be relieved to hear that automatic sending is off by default. If you go back to Settings > Connectors, you can click Gmail to set permissions. Different actions, like searching through your inbox, sending emails, and editing labels, can be set to one of three different options: Never allow, always allow, or always ask for permission.

Here's what happened when I let Claude manage my inbox

I took the risk and gave Claude permission to send emails automatically without approving each draft and got to work. I did consider getting in touch with the Lifehacker editors, but keen to stay on the roster here and avoid any hallucinated misunderstandings, I decided to have an email conversation with myself, via a secondary email address.

Claude actually works really well for getting around your Gmail inbox: It understands labels, dates, contacts, subject headers, themes, and nuance. It easily identified "the email I've just sent myself from my Proton account" without me having to open up Gmail, and I told it to reply—saying that it should agree to a meeting and talk about the weather.

Claude AI
Are you sure you want to do that, Dave? Credit: Lifehacker

One immediate problem: It signed off my email with "cheers,, something I would never say outside of specific scenarios involving bars and clinking glasses. I don't think I've ever used that in an email, but evidently a lot of people in Claude's training data have, which is why it was included. Be aware that Claude may not catch your default tone and personal nuances when you let it compose your messages.

The rest of the email was fine, if a little generic: I agreed to a meeting (with myself), and mentioned the weather (a standard British conversation topic). I then repeated the process several times, giving Claude different levels of freedom when it came to composing message replies.

On a technical level, it's all quite impressive. Claude can accurately pick up and transfer what's in an email thread and compose replies as instructed. I told it to generate a message summarizing my work for the week (via its Google Drive access), and to add a question about a weekend soccer match, and it did both with aplomb. We know AI makes mistakes, but I didn't see any in my testing.

Claude AI
Claude does a good job at summarizing incoming emails. Credit: Lifehacker

As clever as this is, though, the biggest issue is that I can't really see myself using it. To begin with, these emails aren't written in my voice or style, and I'd be continually worried that Claude was about to make a terrible error somewhere (maybe in misinterpreting an incoming email, or getting something wrong in an outgoing one).

Another concern is where all this is heading: AIs emailing other AIs, into infinity? I already suspect a lot of the emails I get are crafted by chatbots, which immediately devalues them. If I'm going to communicate with someone, I feel I owe it to them to actually put together the message myself. While I think I'll keep Claude's Gmail connector around to search and summarize emails, the sending and drafting features are getting turned off for now.



Top Ad 728x90