More Stories

jeudi 21 mai 2026

This Sonos Beam Soundbar Is Over $200 Off Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The first-generation Sonos Beam has dropped to $260.93 at Woot for an open-box unit, and according to price trackers, that’s the lowest price this soundbar has hit so far. For comparison, the same model is still sitting around $488 on Amazon, where it has never dropped below $299. The “open box” label here is also less risky than it sounds. Woot says the packaging may have been opened for testing or display purposes, but the soundbar itself is new and still covered by a standard 12-month manufacturer’s warranty. Shipping is free for Prime members, while everyone else pays an extra $6. This deal runs for the next four days or until stock runs out.

Even though this is the older Beam from 2018, it still holds up surprisingly well if your main goal is improving TV audio without stuffing a giant soundbar under your screen. It is compact enough to fit comfortably in front of most TVs without blocking the display, and it looks clean in a way many bulkier soundbars don’t. More importantly, it works with Alexa, AirPlay 2, Siri, and Google Assistant, and it slides easily into a multi-room Sonos setup if you already own other speakers from the company.

Sonos packed four full-range drivers, a tweeter, and three passive radiators inside its small frame, and the result is a fuller, more detailed sound than most built-in TV speakers can manage. Dialogue comes through clearly, and movies have noticeably better depth and bass without immediately forcing you to buy a separate subwoofer. That said, it doesn’t support newer formats like Dolby Atmos, so you’re not getting the same overhead surround effects you’d find on newer premium models—but for apartments, bedrooms, or smaller living rooms, the Sonos Beam feels appropriately sized.

Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team


This 65-Inch Toshiba Fire TV Is 50% Off Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The 65-inch Toshiba C350 Fire TV is down to $264.99 on Amazon right now, which is half off its usual $529.99 price and the lowest it has dropped so far, according to price trackers. At this price, it sits in the same territory as many smaller budget sets, but with a much bigger screen. The main appeal here is simple: You’re getting a straightforward 65-inch 4K TV with Amazon’s Fire TV platform already built in—and because of that, setup is pretty painless if you already use Amazon devices. Once you sign in with your Amazon account, Prime Video recommendations, watchlists, and Alexa features are already sitting there waiting for you.

The interface looks and behaves exactly like Amazon’s streaming hardware, right down to the content-heavy home screen and Alexa voice controls. Picture quality is decent for the money, though this is still very much an entry-level TV—the C350 handles 4K and HDR content, but it skips higher-end features like local dimming, wide color support, HDMI 2.1 gaming features, or a high refresh rate. In practice, while movies and shows look perfectly fine for casual viewing, contrast and color fall a bit behind those of similarly priced models from TCL and Vizio, especially in darker scenes, notes this CNET review. Fast-moving sports and games also won’t look as smooth as they would on more expensive TVs. Still, for everyday streaming, YouTube, and regular cable viewing, it gets the job done without major issues.

The bigger compromise is really the Fire TV experience itself. Amazon pushes its own content hard, and the interface can feel more cluttered and slower than other smart platform layouts. Some apps also work differently than they do on competing smart TV systems. For example, you can’t directly buy movies inside the Vudu app on this TV. Small annoyances like that add up depending on how you watch things. Also, the USB ports here don’t provide enough power for many external streaming sticks, so if you eventually switch away from Fire TV, you may need separate power cables for those devices.


Our Best Editor-Vetted Tech Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team


This Is How Many Calories You 'Should' Burn Each Day

by

The word “calorie” may bring up thoughts of nutrition labels and treadmill readouts, but really calories are just units of energy. Your car runs on gas, your house runs on electricity, and your body runs on food energy. So how many calories do we burn each day, and how many should you burn? Let’s dig in.

You actually burn most of your calories at rest

Calories aren’t only burned during exercise. It takes energy to keep the lights on, so to speak—for your heart to beat, your brain to think, your cells to repair themselves, and more. 

In fact, most of our calories are burned doing these maintenance chores. Scientists call this baseline calorie burn our "basal metabolic rate," or BMR. There are several equations that will estimate your BMR; for a calculator, try the one at tdeecalculator.net. (It uses the Mifflin-St. Jeor formula if you don’t know your body fat percentage, and the Katch-McArdle formula if you do.)

To give you an example, I plugged in my stats—I’m 150 pounds and 5’6”—and the equation guesses that someone my size burns: 

  • 1,352 calories for most of my basic bodily functions (not including digestion!)

  • 1,623 calories, total, if I’m sedentary

  • 2,096 calories, total, if I do moderate exercise three to five times a week

  • 2,569 calories, total, if I’m a hardcore athlete or a person who exercises on top of having a physical job

Keep in mind these are just estimates; your actual calorie burn may be more or less. (From tracking my calories over the years, I know that I'm usually somewhere between those last two numbers, depending on how active I am.) The factors that affect your total calorie burn include: 

  • Body size: The bigger you are, the more calories you burn at baseline and the more you burn during exercise.

  • Muscle mass: Muscle burns more calories than other tissues, which is why you get a more accurate estimate if you know your body fat percentage; the lower your body fat, the more muscle you have by comparison.

  • Age: These formulas assume that your metabolism slows down a bit as you age (although there is evidence that this may not make a big difference).

  • Activity: The more you exercise, the more calories you burn.

  • Genetics and other factors not accounted for in the formula: There’s actually a huge variety from person to person, even if you compare people of the same size, age, etc. We're all different.

To give you a sense of the range, the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans calculates calorie counts for two example people, who are both a bit smaller than average Americans, but let's take a look anyway. The document figures that a 5’10” man who weighs 154 pounds will burn, in total, between 2,000 and 3,000 calories each day, depending on his age and activity level. Their example woman is 5’4” and 126 pounds, and she will burn between 1,600 and 2,400 calories

So if you’re used to thinking of 2,000 calories as some kind of upper limit for how much to eat—or 1,200 calories as a calorie budget for dieting—you may be surprised to realize how many calories you probably already burn.

How (and why) to burn more calories

If you’re trying to lose weight, logic would say that you should focus more on diet than exercise. After all, if most of your calorie burn is your BMR, exercise is going to be a drop in the bucket by comparison. 

I don’t think that’s the only thing you should consider, though. If your BMR is 1,300 calories and your total burn is 1,600, then sure, you could eat 1,300 calories without exercising and probably lose weight. But it’s hard to be healthy while you’re eating so little. 

Burning more calories through exercise helps your body in two ways: 

  1. Exercise is good for us, regardless of calorie burn; we should all be getting at least 150 minutes of cardio per week, plus some strength training to help build or retain muscle.

  2. The more food you eat, the easier it is to fit in the good stuff: vitamins, minerals, fiber, good fats, and a variety of vegetables.

A person who burns 2,300 calories and eats 2,000 is in a much better position to benefit from exercise and good nutrition than a person who burns 1,600 and eats 1,300. 

So how do you burn more calories? You can’t get younger, and if you’re losing weight you won’t want to get bigger. The biggest levers you can pull are: 

  • Exercise more

  • Gain muscle mass (through strength training, and eating plenty of protein)

  • Don’t diet all the time

I’ve written before about how I’ve noticed my total calorie burn increases when I’m eating more food; when you feed your body, it’s more willing to expend energy. This is one of the reasons it’s thought to be beneficial to take “diet breaks” if you plan to be in a weight-loss phase for a long time.

Why you shouldn’t rely on “calorie burn” numbers from wearables or exercise machines

You’re probably wondering how much exercise is “enough” to burn more calories. It’s a trick question, though: You want to change what kind of person you are—stop being sedentary and become a frequent exerciser—rather than nickel-and-dime yourself about exactly what numbers you burned in which workout.

This is because our bodies get more efficient with exercise over time. A half-hour jog might burn 300 calories in theory, but at the end of the day you may have only burned, say, 200 more than if you hadn’t jogged. You might end up feeling more tired later in the day, or you might just be getting better at running and burning fewer calories when you do it. (This is an ongoing area of scientific research.) 

There is evidence that exercise machines’ estimates of calorie burn are extremely inaccurate; wearables like Fitbits and Apple Watches are probably a bit better, being personalized to your exercise intensity, but they’re still ultimately relying on estimates that aren’t always accurate.



mercredi 20 mai 2026

Android Is Finally Getting Its Own Version of Apple's 'Handoff'

by

Love it or hate it, the Apple ecosystem has its perks. Take "Handoff," for example: If you have at least two connected devices, such as an iPhone and a Mac, you can start a task on one and carry it over to the other. You can start reading an article in Safari on your iPhone, then pick it up when you get to your Mac. Or, say you're on a FaceTime call on your Mac, but you have to run; you can simply switch to your iPhone to keep the conversation going, without having to call them back. It isn't perfect, but it works, it works.

Android doesn't quite have the same setup. While some functions work across devices, like transferring calls, users with an Android phone often don't have the ability to open the same task on their tablet, and vice versa. If you're reviewing a spreadsheet in Google Sheets on your phone, you can't just pick it up on your tablet for a larger view; you instead need to open Sheets on your tablet, then find your way to the document in question. The same goes for many other Google apps, like Chrome, Gmail, Drive, and Docs: Android could really benefit from a dedicated cross-platform option. Luckily, it's on the way, in the form of a new feature called "Continue On."

How "Continue On" works on Android

Google announced "Continue On" during its "What's new in Android" discussion on Tuesday. As reported by 9to5Google, this is a new feature as of Android 17, and will be available in Android 17 RC1. If you've ever used Handoff in the Apple ecosystem, you'll understand the core idea behind Continue On: When you open an app on one of your Android devices, you'll notice the app appear on your other device, with a "Handoff Suggestion label" hovering above it.

handoff suggestion icon
Credit: Google

Say you're working on a Google Doc on your Pixel phone. When you open your Pixel tablet, you'll notice the Google Docs icon populate in the doc, with a special label—even if you already have Google Docs in your dock. If you tap the standard Google Docs icon, you'll open the app as per usual; if you tap the Handoff Suggestion, you'll open the Google Doc you're working on on your phone. In another example, you might be reading through a Gmail thread on your phone, but prefer to finish catching up on your tablet. In this case, the Handoff Suggestion would be Chrome: Tap it on your tablet, and you'll pull up the thread in Gmail on the bigger screen.

Google appears to be taking its time with implementing Continue On. While the feature will work "bidirectionally" in the future, at launch, it only works from phone to tablet. That means you won't be able to hand off a Google Doc from your tablet to your phone, only from your phone to your tablet. Additionally, Google says it's up to developers to decide how they want this experience to run with their own apps. They can open the same app across both devices (Google Docs to Google Docs), or open the web app from the mobile app (Gmail mobile app to Gmail web app in Chrome). Developers can also opt for a mix of both: While the default can be app-to-app, developers can choose to fall back to the web app if the user doesn't have the app installed on their tablet.



This Insta360 Flagship Action Camera Is 21% Off Right Now

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

The Insta360 Ace Pro 2 (Dual Battery Bundle) has dropped to $329.99 on Amazon from its usual $419 price, and according to price trackers, it’s just 99 cents above its all-time low. That makes it one of the more compelling alternatives to the GoPro Hero 13 Black right now, especially for people who want usable 4K footage rather than headline-grabbing 8K specs. The good news is that the camera is genuinely very good at that—it can record 4K at up to 120fps for smooth slow-motion clips, and the footage looks sharp without going overboard on artificial sharpening. The stabilization is also excellent for biking, travel, skiing, or handheld walking shots, where shaky footage usually ruins the experience.

The camera itself remains compact and rugged, with waterproofing and support for the huge ecosystem of mounts and accessories already available for action cameras. Its 1/1.3-inch sensor handles low light better than many rivals, so indoor footage, evening city shots, and cloudy outdoor clips have more detail and less noise than you might expect from a camera this small. Insta360 also includes an I-log profile, which gives experienced editors more flexibility with color grading and dynamic range during post-production. At the same time, beginners can simply use the standard modes and let the camera handle everything automatically. And, unlike the dual-display setup on DJI and GoPro cameras, the Ace Pro 2’s larger front-facing flip-up 2.5-inch touchscreen makes framing yourself much easier when filming solo or recording vlog-style clips.

The bundle includes two batteries, which is helpful because action cameras burn through power quickly when recording high-resolution video. You also get a standard mount, USB-C cable, wind guard, and microphone cap. That said, the Ace Pro 2 has no built-in storage and relies on external storage for most of your recordings, so you will need to buy a microSD card separately (the bundle does not include one). It supports cards up to 1TB, which is useful if you shoot a lot of footage, but it is still an extra cost to factor in.


Our Best Editor-Vetted Memorial Day Deals Right Now
Deals are selected by our commerce team


Why You Should Use Potassium Salt (Even Though It Tastes a Bit Weird)

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

For the past year, I’ve had two salt shakers in my kitchen. One is regular table salt, which I use at the table. The other is filled with Morton Salt Substitute, which is potassium-based, and I use it for the first few shakes of salt when I’m cooking a dish.

The World Health Organization has recommended that more of us use salt substitutes, and not just in the name of lowering sodium: It turns out potassium is generally good for you, and potassium salt substitutes are an easy way to get more of it in your diet. 

The benefits of potassium-based salt

If you’ve ever tried to lower your sodium intake, you’re probably familiar with low-sodium or no-sodium salt substitutes. One potential benefit is, of course, that they provide an easy way to lower your sodium intake if you do a lot of your own cooking. Sodium can contribute to high blood pressure and other health conditions, so the World Health Organization recommends that most of us keep our sodium intake under 2,000 milligrams per day. (The U.S. recommendation is a bit more generous, at 2,300 milligrams.) 

But this isn’t just about sodium. When it comes to heart health, most of us get more sodium than recommended and not enough potassium. Potassium is another mineral your body needs, and consuming more of it has been found to reduce the risks of cardiovascular disease. In one study, for example, people who switched to a potassium-based salt had fewer strokes, heart attacks, and deaths during the study than people who kept using a regular sodium salt.

We normally get potassium from fruits and vegetables. Potassium salt shouldn’t replace that, but it can be a good extra source of the mineral. According to the National Institutes of Health, adult women should get at least 2,600 milligrams of potassium per day, and adult men at least 3,400. 

The downsides of potassium-based salt

Importantly, potassium supplementation is not for everyone. If you have kidney disease or impaired kidney function, or if you’re taking a medication that changes how your body processes potassium, you may want to avoid these salts. (Your healthcare provider can tell you more.)

How potassium salt tastes (and how to work around it)

The people promoting salt substitutes for health tend to wave away concerns about flavor. Most people won’t notice the difference, they say. I don't quite buy that—while you may not notice the difference in every dish, potassium salts do have a subtly different flavor than regular sodium-based table salt. Sprinkle a little on your hand and lick it, and you’ll see what I mean.

Potassium salt is still salty, and it doesn’t taste bad or anything, but it doesn't have quite the same satisfying saltiness as a regular sodium-based table salt. In large amounts, potassium-based salt substitutes can taste slightly metallic or bitter. When companies make low-sodium versions of their products, they know to use a mix of potassium and sodium salts, so that’s what I do at home. 

I use my salt substitute at the beginning of a recipe, when I’m browning meat or sautéing onions. It contributes a general saltiness to the dish. The next time I add salt, it’s usually the sodium kind. I aim for roughly a 50/50 balance, and then the salt shaker I bring to the dinner table is regular old table salt. 

If that’s too complicated, you can just mix both types of salt in the same container. Or buy a salt substitute like Morton Lite, which is a mix of sodium and potassium salts. And if you need a long-term review to convince you it will actually be fine for daily use, one of the largest studies on salt substitutes found that, after five years, 90% of participants were still happily using their salt substitute.



mardi 19 mai 2026

What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: What Are 'Grabavoi Numbers'?

by

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Nothing is really new in conspiracy theories, but the churning morass of social media sometimes mixes up new combinations of old nonsense that bubbles up to the surface unexpectedly. Lately, interest in "Grabovoi codes" or "Grabovoi numbers" is high. The CIA is supposedly hiding Grabovoi codes, strings of numbers that one can concentrate upon in order to cure disease, get rich, and manifest a new car. This video, for instance, has been viewed over a million times in the last couple weeks:

"You can search 'quantum healing codes' at the CIA.gov website and it has many different codes for many different things," This TikToker says, "for instance you would think of the part of your body that's hurting and repeat 55515 and, voila, pain starts to vanish," they add. Many TikTokers are into this. There are over 43,000 posts on the "Grabovoi" hashtag.

It might seem like lightweight wish fulfillment, but I looked into where belief in the Grabovoi codes comes from, and it's way deeper than TikTok. The online world's belief in magic numbers is a case of historical telephone that can be traced to a convicted Russian conman, an American broadcasting tycoon who believed he could travel outside of his body, and the strange history of the CIA and KGB's research into the paranormal—it gets real weird, real quick. But first, do the Grabovoi codes actually work?

Can you use Grabovoi codes to cure pain and disease and/or manifest wealth?

No. But sometimes, kind of yes. There is a library of research about the connection between the cognitive mind and the perception of pain, and scientific research supports the general idea that if you are experiencing mild pain, concentrating on something else, like a specific number, could reduce the perception of that pain. But the number itself is irrelevant; it's the distraction that matters. All other claims about benefits from these numbers—that they represent frequencies connected to specific real life outcomes, that they can help you find love, etc.— are not supported by any evidence.

Do Grabovoi codes come from the CIA?

No. But kind of yes. Despite the claims of online believers, searching "quantum healing codes," or "Grabovoi" in the CIA's declassified files database does not result in a list of healing numbers. There is no mention of the inventor of the Grabovoi numbers, Grigori Grabovoi, in the files either. There is actually one "healing number" contained in declassified CIA files. But first...

Who is Grigori Grabovoi?

Grabovoi is the founder of the Russian group Teaching Universal Salvation and Harmonious Development. He claims he is the second coming of Jesus, can cure cancer, can teleport, and can repair anything, mechanical or electronic, remotely. In 2008, Grabovoi was sentenced to 11 years in a Russian prison for fraud after accepting payment to resurrect children slain in the Beslan school siege. He's served his sentence and lives in Serbia now.

Among the hundreds of books (usually transcripts of lectures) Grabovoi has authored is Restoration of Matter of Human Being by Concentrating on Number Sequence, which lays out some of the Grabovoi numbers. Not all of them, though. Grabovoi tends to publish books of numbers for specific subjects, like Concentration on Numerical Sequences to Reset the Body of Cats. Grabovoi doesn't miss a trick.

Which brings us to TikTok. Beginning around 2016, Grabovoi and his believers/followers started promoting his numbers and theories on Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, and basically everywhere else, and they were spread by people connected with hashtags like #manifestation, particularly when Covid19 was at its peak. So that's why everyone is talking about Grabovoi codes, but it doesn't explain the CIA connection. That's because of Robert Monroe.

Who is Robert Monroe?

Robert Allan Monroe was a media tycoon who made a ton of money producing radio shows in the 1930s and 40s. By the late 1950s, Monroe owned a network of radio stations and early cable TV channels across Virginia. In 1958, this rich radio dude claimed he had a spontaneous out-of-body experience after listening to binaural sounds.

To study the phenomena, Monroe used his considerable wealth to found the Monroe Institute. In 1977 the Institute published the The Gateway Intermediate Workbook, a collection of mental exercises and visualization tools designed to help people relax and/or project their consciousness across time and space. It advised people in pain to close their eyes and repeat "55515" to dull pain signals. Why this number specifically is not explained, but Monroe's whole thing was "hemi-sync" audio signals, aka "binaural beats," so the idea may have been that repeating a precise rhythmic sequence like "five-five-five-one-five" would echo pulsing audio frequencies. It's hard to say. Anyway, repeating this series of numbers is unlikely to have any more effect on pain than repeating anything else, and the research on binaural beats isn't promising. None of this changes the fact that the CIA had a real connection to the Monroe Institute.

How the CIA connected to the Monroe Institute

The Monroe Institute's workbook and other esoteric material were part of the CIA's reading room, and by the late 1970s and into the early 1980s, the U.S. Army and the CIA routinely sent high level intelligence officers to the Monroe Institute's campus, especially in connection with Project Stargate, the military's effort to create psychic soldiers and/or remote viewers who could project their consciousness anywhere they wanted.

The "CIA connection" is the most compelling thing about TikTok's interest in magic numbers. The CIA and army intelligence are thought of as serious, smart people who deal in information the rest of us are not privy to. If they believe in magic numbers, it must be true, right? Well, yes and no. The CIA/military is a group of people, and all groups of people (even smart ones) can be bamboozled.

Cold war paranoia leads to esoteric research

Consider the atomic bomb from a military, non-scientist perspective: If a split atom can level a city, is it that strange to believe the human mind has capacities we don't understand? Add to that the revelation that the USSR was conducting its own paranormal research, and you have a perfect storm. If we're wrong about this, the thinking that led to military paranormal research likely went, and the Soviets make atomic-bomb-level breakthroughs in the field of parapsychology, they'll bury us without firing a shot; it would be crazy to not look into it. And given the massive military budgets of the time, it was a tiny expenditure with a potentially nuclear-level outcome. (There's also the possibility that both the CIA and the KGB were purposefully deceiving one another about the extent of their research to make the other spend more. Things get shadowy during the Cold War.)

Enter the Monroe Institute. Robert Allan Monroe wasn't a wild-eyed hippie. He wore expensive suits and had straight white teeth. At least on the surface, the Monroe Institute was taking a corporate approach to the mind/body connection. Its approach was structured, serious, and deliberately clinical. The Gateway Workbook is a step-by-step process instead of a leap of faith. The Monroe Institute was the kind of place the military might feel confident sending its men.

The reality check of the 1990s

Research into remote viewing and other esoterica went on, seemingly with no tangible results. In 1989, Soviet Union collapsed without the help of psychic warriors or atomic bombs, and the CIA took a hard look at its paranormal programs in the mid 1990s. 1995's report "An Evaluation of Remote Viewing: Research and Applications," concludes, "OK, this was dumb and it never worked and we should stop throwing money at it." I mean, that's the gist. Anyway, the material was declassified so we could all take a look at how our taxes are spent.

Which brings us back to TikTok. Everything the CIA releases has always been pored over by curious people, where it marinates with other "official" weirdness like UFO research and quantum mechanics until it gets spit back in altered form. The no-context architecture of social media seems designed to legitimize fringe ideas. A convicted Russian conman's magic numbers collide with a wealthy eccentric's out-of-body workbook that got filed in a CIA reading room, and suddenly a million people think the CIA has a secret cure for back pain.

The low cost of entry of the Grabovoi codes

I don't think too many people on TikTok really believe that they can manifest magic and get rid of pain by repeating a number, but like a paranoid military throwing a few million at psychic research in the remote hopes of a Cold War-winning breakthrough, the barrier to entry is low. When you're in pain or you're broke or you're scared, why not repeat some numbers to yourself? It can't hurt.

But it won't help that much, either. Research shows that cognitively demanding tasks like puzzles or math problems are more effective ways to distract yourself from pain than repeating a number, and while learning about out-of-body experiences from the Monroe Institute (which is still around, by the way) might be interesting, there are better ways to relax and clear your mind. For instance, rather than spending $2,895.00 to sit around in a dark room in Virginia envisioning a tropical beach at the Institute's five-day "Gateway Voyage," book a trip to Bali. For the same price, you could actually be on a tropical beach, and stay at a luxury villa with a private plunge pool and a personal butler.



Top Ad 728x90